High-Adventure Science

Exploring Evidence, Models and Uncertainty Related to Questions Facing Scientists Today

High-Adventure Science brings several of the big unanswered questions in Earth and space science — think climate change, the availability of freshwater, land management and more — to middle and high school science classrooms.

Each module includes interactive computer-based systems models and real-world data on unanswered questions scientists are facing today. Students explore evidence and discuss the issues of certainty — and uncertainty — with the models and data.


Articles and Papers

For Researchers

« Go Back



High-Adventure Science Funded

High-Adventure Science: (NSF DRL-0929774, 9/15/09 – 8/31/12, PI: Pallant, $695,075) The goal of High-Adventure Science is to bring the excitement of frontier science into the classroom by allowing students to explore pressing unanswered questions in Earth and Space Science that scientists around the world are currently investigating. While we do not expect students will be able to solve the problems posed in the curriculum, our goal is to have students experience doing science the way scientists do. It is the approach that matters— one based on thinking critically about evidence, making predictions, formulating explanations, drawing conclusions, and qualifying the level of certainty of those conclusions.

Primary Research Questions

  • How do students' scientific argumentation abilities change during and after the use of High-Adventure Science investigations?
  • How do students' content knowledge change during and after the use of High-Adventure Science investigations?
  • How do students' justifications and considerations of rebuttal change during and after High-Adventure Science investigations?
  • What types of uncertainty do students exhibit while working with complicated computational models and scientific data sets?

Read the High-Adventure Science Project Proposal »

close this

What is the future of Earth’s climate?

The High-Adventure Science Climate module has five activities. Explore the question, what will Earth's climate be in the future? Through a series of guided questions, you will explore interactions between factors that affect Earth's climate. Explore temperature data from ice cores, sediments, and satellites and greenhouse gas data from atmospheric measurements, run experiments with computational models, and hear from a climate scientist working to answer the same question. You will not be able to answer the question at the end of the module, but you will be able to explain how scientists can be certain that Earth is warming while not being entirely certain about how much Earth will warm.

Try the What is the future of Earth’s climate? activity »

close this

Will there be enough fresh water?

The High-Adventure Science Water module has five activities. In this module you will consider the question: will there be enough fresh water? In this guided activity, you will explore the distribution and uses of fresh water on Earth. Explore models of porosity and permeability, run experiments with computational models, and hear from a hydrologist working on the same question. You will not be able to answer the module's framing question at the end of the module, but you will be able to explain how humans can preserve supplies of fresh water for the future.

Try the Will there be enough fresh water? activity »

close this

Development of "Is there life in space?" Curriculum

In this investigation, students explore the question: Can there be life outside of Earth? Students use planet-hunting models to discover how scientists find new planets and perform simulated spectroscopic measurements to determine if the chemical requirements for life are present.

Try the Is there life in space? activity »

close this

High-Adventure Science: Earth's Systems and Sustainability Funded

High-Adventure Science: Earth's Systems and Sustainability (HAS:ESS): (DRL-1220756. 10/1/12 – 1/31/16. PI: Pallant, Co-PIs: Lee and Norris). This project will develop additional modules for middle and high school students in Earth and Space Science classes. The goal of HAS:ESS is to research the effectiveness of curriculum materials to reliably convey an understanding of Earth's systems and the increasing role of human interaction with those systems, while also introducing important science practices and crosscutting concepts. The HAS:ESS project builds on the results of the High-Adventure Science project. The Concord Consortium (CC), in partnership with the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) and the National Geographic Society, is developing these modules, conducting the research and will be broadly disseminating these materials via far-reaching education networks.

Read the High-Adventure Science: Earth's Systems and Sustainability Proposal »

close this

High-Adventure Science: Earth Science Assessments with Automated Feedback Funded

The Investigating How to Enhance Scientific Argumentation through Automated Feedback in the Context of Two High School Earth Science Curriculum Units proposal (NSF DRL-1418019 9/1/14-8/31/18 PI Liu, co-PIs Pallant and Lee) responds to the national need for technology-enhanced, formative science assessments that promote argumentation practice through inquiry-based science teaching and learning. Guided by comprehensive argumentation theories and drawing on advanced automated scoring technologies with proven validity, we will apply automated scoring tools to facilitate immediate feedback to formative, constructed-response assessment items. The feedback will provide both individual student and class-level information to help improve learning and teaching of argumentation for high school students and teachers.

Primary Research Questions

  1. To what extent can automated scoring tools diagnose students’ explanations and uncertainty articulations as compared to human diagnosis?
  2. How should feedback be designed and delivered to help students improve scientific argumentation?
  3. How do teachers use and interact with class-level automated scores and feedback to support students' scientific argumentation with real-data and models?
  4. How do students perceive their overall experience with the automated scores and immediate feedback?

Read the High-Adventure Science: Earth Science Assessments with Automated Feedback Proposal »

close this

Will the air be clean enough to breathe?

The High-Adventure Science Air Quality module has five activities. Explore the question, will the air be clean enough to breathe? You will be guided through the analysis of models and real-world data as you explore the interactions of factors that affect a region's air quality. You will not be able to answer the module's framing question at the end of the module, but you will be able to predict the effect of human development on a region's air quality.

Try the Will the air be clean enough to breathe? activity »

close this

Development of "What are our choices for supplying energy for the future?" Curriculum

The High-Adventure Science Energy module has five activities. Explore the question, what are our energy choices? In this module, you will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different energy sources for generating electricity. A particular focus is given to natural gas extracted from shale formations through the hydraulic fracturing process. At the end of the module, you will be able to compare the relative costs and benefits (abundance, ecological impacts, etc.) of different sources used for generating electricity.

Try the What are our choices for supplying energy for the future? activity »

close this

Development of "Can we feed the growing population?" Curriculum

Our agricultural system is made up of interconnected resources. The availability of these resources affects how much food we can produce.

In this module, you will explore the resources that make up our agricultural system in order to answer the question: can we feed the growing population? Food production is faced with an ever-growing number of challenges. Growing enough food depends on the availability of resources such as arable land, sunlight, rain, and organic matter.

Throughout this activity, you will explore land uses and soil quality through graphs of land use and crop production. You will run experiments with computational models to compare the effect of different management strategies on the land. You will not be able to answer the module's framing question at the end of the module, but you will be able to describe how humans can maintain and replenish important resources to be able to produce food long into the future.

Try the Can we feed the growing population? activity »

close this

Development of Explanation-Certainty Item sets

Making and defending claims are the hallmarks of critical thinking and scientific argumentation skills, but our curriculum doesn't stop there. To examine how students' critical thinking skills change whey they make claims based on evidence, we developed new explanation certainty item sets. These item sets consist of four separated questions that require students to:

  1. make scientific claims (claim)
  2. explain their claims based on evidence (explanation)
  3. express their level of certainty (certainty)
  4. describe the source(s) of their certainty (certainty rationale)

close this

Classroom Pilot-Testing

Nine teachers from MA and NY pilot-tested the High-Adventure Science climate, space, and water investigations. The pilot-test teachers were asked to give a pre-test and nature of science survey at the beginning of the year, test one or two of the investigations, including separate pre- and post-tests for each of the investigations.

close this

Elaboration of the Theoretical Construct

To evaluate students' process skills, we developed a theoretical construct that enabled us to focus on two important aspects of the nature of science: 1) explanations, and 2) explanation in the context of scientific argumentation.

In the second part of the explanation certainty item set, students explain their claims. Students' explanation of their claims are scored against item-specific rubrics. A generic rubric is shown below.

Explanation 

Criteria

Irrelevant (Score 0)

Did not write anything, wrote unrelated text

No link (Score 1)

Elicited non-normative ideas or restated the question

Partial link (Score 2)

Elicited one or more normative ideas

Full link (Score 3)

Used two ideas that are meaningfully connected

Complex link (Score 4)

Used three or more normative ideas that are meaningfully connected

In the fourth part of the explanation-certainty item set, students explain their rationale for choosing a particular certainty rating. Students certainty rationales are scored with a rubric that groups student explanations into personal and scientific categories.

Certainty Rationale

Source

Description of categories

No Information (Score 0)

No response, simple off-task responses, restatement

Did not respond, wrote "I don't know" or similar answers, provided off-task answers, restated scientific claim or certainty rating

Personal   (Score 1)

Question, general knowledge/ability, lack of specific knowledge/ability, difficulty with data, authority

Did/did not understand the question, did/did not possess general knowledge/ability necessary to answer the question, did/did not learn the topic, can/cannot explain/estimate, did not know specific scientific knowledge, did not make sense of data provided in item, mentioned teacher, textbook, or other sources

Scientific-Within Investigation (Score 2)

Specific knowledge, data

Referred to/elaborated a particular piece of scientific knowledge directly related to the item, referred to a particular piece of scientific data provided in the item

Scientific-Beyond Investigation (Score 3)

Data/investigation, phenomenon, current science

Recognized the limitation of data in the item, mentioned that not all factors are considered, elaborated why the scientific phenomenon addressed in the item is uncertain, mentioned that current scientific knowledge or data collection tools are limited

close this


Classroom Field-Testing

Twelve field-test teachers were asked to administer a pretest, with questions covering content related to all three investigations, and a nature of science survey at the beginning of the year, two or three of the investigations, with separate pre-and post-tests for each investigation, and an end-of-the-year post- test (with the same questions as the beginning-of-the-year pre-test). Teachers from Nevada, Indiana, Montana, New Jersey, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Michigan, Massachusetts, and New York participated in the field-testing.

close this

Results from Classroom Tests

Students were tested with pre/posttests consisting of multiple items followed by constructed response explanation items. Students showed significant pre/ post score gains on all three curricular modules, with the effect size being 0.52 standard deviation (SD) for the climate change module, 0.69 SD for the freshwater availability module, and 0.71 SD for the life in space module.

Read the High-Adventure Science Project Final Report »

close this

Formative Research: Design Studies

We studied scaffolding features for argumentation items and for systems thinking. Design studies focused on:

  • Exploring the benefits of argumentation scaffolds focused on claim, justification, and certainty considerations on student learning.
  • Investigating systems thinking and systems dynamics scaffolds for understanding complex Earth systems and Earth system models.
  • Developing systems dynamics construct.

Five teachers implemented climate and water modules. Different versions were created and randomly assigned to classes. Teachers implemented pre- and post-tests as well as completed demographic surveys.

close this

Elaboration of Systems Dynamics Construct

According to literature, systems thinking is a multi-faceted construct involving system structure, interactions within a systems, and dynamics of the whole system. In HAS: ESS modules, we focus on "systems dynamics" where a complex system is taken as a whole and emphasize concepts such as (1) time delay (the lag between the initiation of a control action and its effect), (2) non-linear causality (cause-and-effect chains and loops in which causes are not necessarily proportional to their effects), and (3) stocks and flows (how the quantity in a stock varies over time given the rates of flow into and out of the system). We are currently investigating a systems dynamics construct for the Land and the Air modules.

close this

Classroom Design Studies

Fifteen teachers attended our online professional development seminars and twelve piloted modules in their classroom. Two were middle school teachers and 10 taught high school. The schools were located in MA, PA, NC, OH, KY, IL, IN, MI, MN, MT, and AZ.

close this

Design Studies

Twelve teachers attended an in-person professional development workshop. Each were asked to administer a pretest at the beginning of the school year, and several modules, each with separate pre-and post-tests. Teachers from MT, IN, NC, NY, KY, MN.

close this

Partners

The Concord Consortium is proud to partner with these organizations for the High-Adventure Science project.

National Science Foundation (NSF)This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-0929774 and DRL-1220756. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Contact Us

Questions? Comments? You can reach us at has@concord.org.

Connect with us online for news about High-Adventure Science and more.

License

This project is © Copyright 2014 by The Concord Consortium and is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Please provide attribution to The Concord Consortium and the URL http://concord.org.



Use with Your Students

Create a class and register students to get reports of their progress and responses to embedded assessments.

The Concord ConsortiumThe Concord Consortium

Revolutionary digital learning for science, math and engineering

High-Adventure Science is a project of the Concord Consortium — a nonprofit educational research and development organization based in Concord, Massachusetts. Our pioneering work brings the promise of technology into reality for STEM education.

Learn more »